Souke SportsMen's Cycling Underwear Shorts 4D Padded Bike Bicycle MTB Liner Shorts with Anti-Slip Leg Grips

These are really well made, very comfortable, and a great value. The fabric is nice and stretchy and the waistband is wide and strong enough to stay up. The padding is very heavy - the thickest I've ever worn. I like it for winter biking under heavy clothing, but might see if Souke has a more lightly padded version for warmer weather. For reference, I am 6'2" and 230 pounds with a 38" waist and the XXL size fits me perfectly.

I'm 5'9" and about 210 lbs. 30" inseam. The XL fit me well. Plenty of stretch to accommodate my out of shape dad bod.Padding is sufficient. I'd prefer less poof/volume and more density but that's hard to find, especially in the unpronouncable brands.What I like is how short these are.. they come to mid-thigh in the XL. That's hard to find.I tried Spooneed as well.. and while those were nice, the legs were too long... came all the way to my knee. If I could lose weight and wear a large, then they might work.The grip/elastic at the bottom of the leg is a little tight for my massive quads but not uncomfortable. They stay put.The fabric is very soft and thin with sort of a waffle weave to it. I wouldn't feel super comfortable wearing these without an over-short if I were riding in a city and/or stopping to run errands.. but I'm old school and practice some modesty.Good shorts, good price. Not great like 10-20 year ago $80 shorts you'd get from Specialized, Pearl Iz.. but still very good for the money.

I've been looking for padded shorts for long touring motorcycle rides and also bike for cardio, so tried a few different brands. These, have "high support" especially for the perineum area where it's focused compared to other brands. I found the Souke has an amazing all-around feel for hips and legs with thicker padding, but the rear height is only slightly taller than Baleaf. I'm 6'3 and fit above the top end of the 4X scale. 44" waist 335lb and mis-ordered the 3X. But the fit great on my big butt! The legbands are slightly tight but not uncomfortable on my large 33" muscular thighs. They don't ride up either. I do wish the padding was about 3-4 inches higher in back to cover upright/reclined sitting on motorcycle. And 2" longer in front. I haven't ridden distance but testing out sitting here I can feel the top edge (front and back) of the padding might be a problem. Possible update in the next couple days after a 100mi ride. The look could pass for riding shorts also, not just undergarment.The padding ends about 2.5" above the base of the glute/thigh and in front about 1/2 scrote. Not everyone riding is "in shape" and I'm sure plenty like me are trying to get there - we need a little 'support' too. The packaging and delivery speed are great.

I'm def getting a couple more pairs of these things down the road. I bought thus pair an another brand just to try. The other brand the legs rode so far up into my crotch during the ride many times and had to keep pulling them down. These were the opposite! The material at the bottom of these helps stick to the leg and feels comfortable. The pad also works good, been on s couple longer rides with these and decider I'm going to get a couple more pairs soon as they will be my go to for mountain biking!

I'm a cyclist. Most frequently, I'm riding my road bike for exercise on either greenways or roads, in which case I'm wearing padded, suspender-style cycling shorts.On occasion, however, I'm riding my commuter bike while on a recreational ride with my wife. In these cases, I've got a pair of loose-fitting, unpadded touring bike shorts to wear. In the past, I've simply worn a pair of athletic undershorts under the touring bike shorts. Over time, I had decided that really needed the padding that I had with my regular cycling shorts, but didn't want to wear my regular cycling shorts for recreational cycling instead of my touring shorts (as we sometimes combine a ride with a restaurant stop or social visit).Wearing regular cycling shorts underneath my touring shorts would be way too bulky and inconvenient, so my solution was to look for a pair of relatively-inexpensive padded cycling underwear shorts to combine with my touring bike shorts.Padded cycling underwear shorts have padding similar to, but less dense than, regular cycling shorts (so not quite as good, but good enough for a "comfort" saddle or a well-padded MTB saddle). They are made of lighter-weight, mesh fabric (similar to daily-wear stretch boxer briefs). That lighter fabric is a bit more revealing, so they really need to be worn underneath another pair of shorts, pants, or tights (which is what they're made for, of course).Given that I would be using these only occasionally, I decided to limit the cost to $25 (at the time of my purchase on 5/25/22).Based on my experience with regular cycling shorts, I was specifically looking for Mens Cycling Underwear Shorts that had the following features: * Wide waistband (narrow waistbands tend to roll during a ride or lose their stretch sooner after repeated washing). * Ample padding (for use with a comfort or well-padded MTB saddle) with good coverage; a too-small pad is as bad as a too-thin pad. * Longer inseam (I'm 6'2" with 34" inseam legs and long thighs; shorter inseam stretch shorts ride up on my thighs, which is annoying during daily wear, let alone during a bike ride). * Leg bottom-seam gripper material (again, to lessen the chance of the legs riding up); this is usually some kind of stretchy silicone material. * A structural design with multiple panels (for an optimized fit for a seated position); good cycling shorts will have 8 or more panels, exclusive of the crotch pad panel; the reviewed products all have either 9 or 10 panels. Note: The lighter-weight stretch mesh fabric used in the reviewed products may make panel count a less-significant factor than with regular cycling shorts. * Flat seams at all panel joints (as opposed to a gathered seam, which bunches up, and can cause irritation during athletic activities).I'll admit that this was a pretty demanding feature list for a target price of <$25; to my surprise,there were 5 candidate products that were worth ordering for comparison.Below are my evaluations of the fit and features of these cycling underwear shorts, with the names given as shown on the Amazon product pages (price in parentheses; all were solid black in size XL and fit my 39" waist comfortably; inseam lengths measured from the center of the crotch panel):* Przewalski Mens Cycling Underwear Shorts 4D Padded Bike Undershorts Bicycle MTB Liner Shorts with Silicone Leg Grippers ($14.99) - This product is my top choice, as it has all my desired features, and is the only product with a 9" inseam. It is made with a 90% polyester, 10% spandex mesh material (according to the Amazon product description; there was no material composition tag in the product, but it definitely felt like polyester microfiber). Additionally, the leg gripper is a solid silicone band, which is what I'm used to seeing in higher-quality cycling shorts. Finally, this product has 100% flat seams. One possible con: Because of the long inseam, the bottom of the leg falls just below the thickest part of my thighs, making the bottom edge feel slightly loose, but the quality of the gripper band gives me confidence that I won't have any issues with their riding up. If you have more-slender thighs, however, this may not be the product for you. Note that the product received didn't visually match the photos on the Amazon product page--the waistband has the brand name on it (versus solid black in the photos) and the seat pad design looks slightly different (more forward coverage than shown in the photos, which is actually good, though it does leave me wondering whether you're actually getting the padding densities that are shown in the pad "exploded view" image).* [THIS PRODUCT] Souke Sports Men's Cycling Underwear Shorts 4D Padded Bike Bicycle MTB Liner Shorts with Anti-Slip Leg Grips ($24.99) - The most expensive product in this comparison, it has a higher-density pad than my top choice (though the coverage isn't quite as good to the front of the pad). If you'll be riding on a road bike saddle (or a less-padded MTB saddle) instead of a comfort saddle, this product may be the ticket for a comfortable ride for you. It is made with a 90% polyester, 10% spandex mesh material, and has a 6.5" inseam. The gripper material is woven into a stretch bottom-seam panel (which should work OK, but not as well as the solid silicone band in my top choice). One significant con is that the inner leg seams are NOT flat seams, so be conscious of the possibility of inner-thigh chafing.* XGC Men's Cycling Underwear Shorts with High-Density High-Elasticity and Highly Breathable 4D Gel Padded ($19.99) - This product is almost identical to the Souke product, with different branding and a slightly-less-dense pad. It is made with a 95% polyester, 5% elastane mesh material, and has a 6.5" inseam. All other features and notes on the Souke product review also apply to this product (including the absence of inner-leg flat seams).* Nice Win Mens 4D Padded Bike Shorts Anti-slip Leg Cycling Underwear MTB Liner Wide WaistBand Biking Bicycle Motorcycle Underpants - This product has a lower-density pad than the previous three products in this review. While this may work OK with a comfort saddle, I don't think I'd recommend it for use with an MTB saddle (and certainly not with a road bike saddle). It is made with an 81% nylon, 19% spandex mesh material (not polyester, as stated in the Amazon product description), and has a 7" inseam. The gripper material is woven into a stretch bottom-seam panel (which should work OK, but not as well as the solid silicone band in my top choice). One significant con is that the inner leg seams are NOT flat seams, so be conscious of the possibility of inner-thigh chafing. Note: The nylon material in this product has a much more "slippery" feel to it than the polyester microfiber material in the other four reviewed products. This may lead to some "slippage" between these shorts and your outwear shorts/pants, which could result in some sliding around on the bike saddle. I didn't test this product on a ride, so I can't say for sure that this would be a problem, but be aware of the possibility.* Baleaf Men's Cycling Underwear Shorts 3D Padded Bike Bicycle Pants Quick-Dry Tights ($22.99; a 10% coupon was available) - This product has a lower-density pad than the first three products in this review (similar to the Nice Win product). While this may work OK with a comfort saddle, I don't think I'd recommend it for use with an MTB saddle (and certainly not with a road bike saddle). It is made with a 90% polyester, 10% spandex mesh material, and has a 5.5" inseam (a full inch shorter than any other reviewed product). Finally, this product DOES have 100% flat seams. There is one very significant con: To my surprise, there is NO gripper material at the bottom of the legs; combined with the shorter-than-average inseam, I would be concerned about the legs riding up while cycling.

Selected a size large over medium according to there size chart, and it fits great, size charts seems accurate.

True to size, they don't slide around. Foam feels a little cheap but the price is right.

Good quality and good price

These are well made and fit just a tad small. I ordered the large and am a 36" waist at the moment. They're supposed to be tight fitting, though. The leg bands are generous and comfortable. The padding is thick so if you're used to Castelli singlets be aware that these are well padded. Waist band is also comfortable. Such a good deal considering the aforementioned brand is in the mid $200 range for the budget model. Highly recommended.

Buen producto

Llego lo que se ofreció, todo bien, 100% recomendable !!!!

por comentarios que lei, decia que habia que pedir una talla mas grande de lo que uno es, en mi caso la talla que uso normalmente fue la adecuada

Overall , the size fit me well. Material look satisfactory . delivery to my home is great.