AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core, 12-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler & Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4 DRAM 3000MHz C15 Desktop Memory Kit - Black (CMK16GX4M2B3000C15)

Lol, what I don't like, is that Amazon is marketing the wrong stats. They have two bundles with RAM. One initially informing the consumer of the CAS latency, 15, and one with 16. The one with 15 is cheaper, even though less CAS latency is better. This would confuse a lot of people, it did for me for a second. It was cheaper than the other and they're showcasing the wrong stat. Cas latency is important and higher CANNNNNN be better for overclocking on Ryzen and such however weighing it like that without knowing both stats is completely arbitrary, and kinda stupid. Especially because in this case, the CAS latencies weren't far enough apart to justify the price difference, and especially not showcasing it first. A more accurate reflection of the RAM would be, what everyone else posts first, the frequency. Maybe I'm wrong, I dun have it yet, I haven't got a chance to play with OC'ing but as I understand it the higher the initial timing, the tigher you can get it through overclocking, which, in the end will give you more room to overclock higher but if it already starts at a higher frequency you'll obviously have some kind of diminishing return. Heh, this has never been the case with any ram, the latency is a factor, but A. frequency in ram matters more ( unless CAS latency is insanely high ) and B. Most people just look at the frequency as a benchmark for the performance. I mean how do you explain people shelling out 100 dollars + extra for the i9-9900ks which was basically a chip that could do what all the non-special edition i9-9900k could with a decent cooler, which everyone had to buy anyway because apparently the price tag didn't warrant partnering with a cooling company, and still had the same limitations. I'm sorry but overpricing an already overpriced and underperforming, for the price, CPU because they choose to say something different about it. Or because it's Out of the box stats are slightly tweaked. OC'ing an Intel chip is not that hard and changing a flawed way in which you dissipate heat on the IHS, and maybe some binning does not make cinderella a princess. It's as confusing as it would be had they posted the opposite as well. If the roles were reversed, and if they were that might have not been as bad if they CAS latency's were so close it would have been just as confusing. The first ram is 3000mhz, and the second is 32000mhz. If they'd said the first one was 3200mhz and cheaper and the second of the same brand and even model was 3000mhz and more expensive people would have been scratching their heads, probably even more so. I've talked to computer people before and most of them are fairly knowledgable. However, everyone learns this stuff if they're into it and over time. This just seems like a massive oversight ( put the higher number later at a higher price so it makes sense ). Shame shame Amazon.