The Beatles in Mono

Having been a Beatles fan since the very beginning the mono versions of their earlier records were all I knew. Many of the stereo versions that eventually came out were a bit of a disappointment. After reading The Beatles in Mono it confirms that I wasn't just being nostalgic in preferring the mono versions. This book brings back the initial feelings of excitement when hearing the records for the first time. I've read many many books on The Fabs and, believe me, this is one of the best. Better than 'Revolution in the Head' and easier to absorb than 'Tell me Why.' Well balanced, intelligent and extremely well written.

This is a reasonably entertaining trawl through The Beatles' mono catalogue.It contains much in the way of the author's opinion but very little in established fact, which makes it a fairly useless addition to the existing canon of Beatles writings.Most of the facts presented here have been dis-credited/ are rendered irrelevant, by thorough research - for example: does the author know 'why' the lead and backing vocals on the mono version of the Help! single are different from the stereo, or 'why' the mono sound is murkier than the stereo?The answer is too complex to relate here but it would have been refreshing to have come across it in this book as it is one of the major events in the Beatles' mono/stereo story.-Or how about the final guitar riff at the end of What Goes On?-Or why the separation on those early stereo mixes is so wide?For a more factual based approach (and a more worthwhile one), I would suggest that the author, and any potential reader, track down a copy of Mark Lewisohn's 'Complete Beatles Recording Sessions' or 'The Complete Beatles Chronicle'.In addition, 'Recording The Beatles' by Kevin Ryan and Brian Kehew is a fascinating read, (and will tell you the answer to the Help! question too).The reason I mention these books is that they contain between them about as much knowledge on The Beatles' recording sessions as is known. (Unfortunately the prices of these books can be quite high).To finish, this is really only worth the bother if you're paying the Kindle price (and even then it should be no more than £1). Otherwise you'd be better off sitting down and listening out for the differences yourself.If you've come this far looking for a book about The Beatles in mono, I heartily recommend that you seek out the books mentioned above.

Good over all analytical of the Beatles catalogue, The omission of Album covers etc are a minus to the Book, but I think the cost would have been too much for Andrew, as he informs us that the cover photo is in the 'Public domain' and can be used in general, (I think, I am paraphrasing him), but the overall commentary is well researched and he qualifies everything he said about each track. I dodn't agree with everything he said, but that is always good for debate, certainly where the Beatles are concerned!

Don't agree with all he says actually The Beatles were god

Not what I expected. I expected this to be a book explaining the differences between mono and stereo mixes. This book is just a track by track review based on the authors opinions. If you want a decent track by track review then there are better books out on the market for this. If you're looking for a book explaining the differences between mono and stereo mixes, then this is not the book you're looking for.

'The Beatles In Mono' is probably the Beatles book I dip into most often. There are others written by insiders with access to which other musician played exactly which trombone, but that doesn't excite me so much as someone who can make me hear something different in songs I've heard a hundred times. And Andrew Hickey's book does that. Each time I open it up there's something to listen to again and go 'Wow': the reverb on the mono 'Paperback Writer'; the Beatles versus Beatles play-off in the stereo 'Think For Yourself'; the swearing in 'Hey Jude'...! Some people don't like that Andrew's opinionated. He is, but he also loves all four of the Beatles as well as being critical of some aspects of each of their work. I just don't believe reviews that say 'Every single thing is equally brilliant!' That's not a review. That's a total surrender of all critical faculties. I like his reasons for raving about some songs and his occasional putting the boot into one, so I can go 'He's wrong!' or less often, 'Oh dear. He's probably right'. Either way it makes for a much more interesting read, and he's unnecessarily self-deprecating about it too. Oh, and he covers the stereo-only LPs to for completism, just in less detail.I mostly listen to songs on headphones and am prejudiced to the sound being different in each to keep me diverted, so my instinctive preference is stereo. But I also wanted to hear what the Mono mixes that were often meant to be the 'important' ones sounded like, and this book is a great companion and champion for them to challenge my prejudices. Mr Hickey thinks mono is best and eloquently says why for most tracks, and I like a point of view that's not mine to make me appreciate them more! As well as the music, though, he's funny. He has a witty turn of phrase ("being grumpy in minor chords" made me laugh even about a song I like) and also loves the Beatles songs that are wittier than lots of people notice, pointing out the jokes. He even made me listen to some Wagner to compare famous chords... But the music is his big thing, and it's worth buying just for his enthusiasm about the Ringo-Paul drum'n'bass combo, where you think, yeah, they really did have an amazing groove. Fascinating choice of favourite Paul song as well - I'd not have thought of it, but I can see why. It's not perfect, obviously, because he has opinions and there's something in it for everyone to disagree with, but few actual mistakes (the only one I can think of is saying 'Eight Days A Week' is the Beatles' only fade-in intro, forgetting George's fab 'I Want To Tell You'). But overall it's a great read that I keep coming back to because it makes me find interesting, new sides to songs I love. What could be a better recommendation for a music book than that?

very good review of the mono set. made me buy the mono set

Leider ist Hickey kein Fan von McCartney. Bei jeder unpassenden Gelegenheit reibt er es einem unter die Nase. Schade, das ist leider nicht objektiv und passt nicht zu dieser Art von Buch. Ansonsten ist es ganz interessant.

Whether you prefer to hear The Beatles in mono or stereo, this well organized collection helps to straighten out the various versions/mixes of this timeless rep. The Beatles, as with the Stones, early Pink Floyd, The Who, The Kinks, The Zombies, etc released their records in both formats, and not always by their own choosing, which resulted in variants of these songs going out to the unwashed masses. With the Beatles catalog, their own participation and involvement in the studio process lent credence to the importance of mono vs. stereo mixes. So this book helps to set things straight for those who only know of the grand stereo releases played on radio, etc.Still, I've read enough copy about the Beatles to know that seldom does one come across objective, critical evaluations of their work. As fans, we're always going to show our personal biases. The author of The Beatles in Mono is extraordinarily biased and one-sided in his evaluation of the music and in his preference of artists, but this did grow out of a blog, where one has the freedom to speak what one wishes. Once you look past those issues, Hickey does a fine job of laying out enough of the facts to make this collection worth a read.

I may not be in harmony with everything in this book, but that is one the reason I liked it, Andrew Hickey offers a fresh well documented approch as a person and as a musician and it's unbiased , as a bonus it's also well written and easy to follow.This is a real aficionado item.Good job Andrew!

I'm fairly certain most Beatle "scholars" who come across this book will be, like myself, underwhelmed. The book promises to represent an in-depth song-by-song analysis of the differences between the mono and stereo versions of the 2009 special releases of the Beatles canon. In fact, the "analysis" generally appears as an extremely brief and often non-specific few sentences at the bottom of each individual album track review. The majority of the reviews are comprised mainly of Hickey's own evaluation of the songs in terms of their worth as compositions.Like many Beatle fans, the author rightly holds in total awe Lennon's brilliance as one of the greatest songwriters in the history of popular music. Conversely, however, his disdain for Lennon's chief creative counterpart Paul McCartney is frankly ridiculous. Throughout the book, Hickey regularly informs the reader of Paul's inferiority to Lennon on almost every level; he gives only occasional, grudging credit to Paul for his contributions to the Beatles as a creative force, while frequently dismissing McCartney tracks as being grossly overrated. Most serious Beatle fans recognize that while McCartney was certainly capable of superficial banality, particularly during the group's later period, both he and Lennon relied upon one another for not only direct assistance with each other's songs, but also for the positive effect the competitive nature of their working relationship had upon the quality of their respective compositions. Hickey never seems to recognize this crucial dynamic.It was disappointing, as a life-long Beatles follower, to have been expecting in Hickey's work an exhaustive, detailed analysis of the wonders of the Beatles in mono, but instead to find myself distracted by the author's curious disregard for Paul McCartney's contribution to the Beatles canon.