House - Season 2 (Hugh Laurie)

Well I bought all the house season from 1 to 4 and I completely love this series...but when at the beginning of each DVD there is a 2 minute long film of how not to download and copy DVDs it is very annoying to find out that when you actually buy the stuff it doesn't work!!!! A very good friend of mine was at my place once and we were watching it together and he loved it too so I thought it would be proper to get him season 2 as a Christmas present! And guess what??!!!! 2 episodes from the DVDs didn't play at all! The producers of the DVDs, and Amazon selling it should not complain if later an unsatisfied and frustrated customer stops buying original DVDs and starts downloading them! All in all it is a great series! Highly recommended!

Having seen Hugh in many of his comedy roles on UK TV and not liking them very much it is a delight to see his obvious humorous streak loosed on the world hidden under the guise of a serious drama. I think that the true talent of the actor is given open forum through the antics of a character who is meant to be serious yet openly flaunts his ability to be sarcastic. A wealth of good television can be found in this series which will rarely be found in any other. A really good watch. My respect for Hugh as an actor has been elevated dramatically.

I like Hugh Laurie, he's a very witty/funny man in his own right and the character he plays in this drama series is brilliant, he's arrogant, aggressive, objective and honest with his patience, sometimes a little too honest but he also lies cheats and bends/breaks the rules as a means to an end. there are lots of funny one liners and snipes in every episode, if you don't laugh at least two or three times per episode you might need a sense of humor transplant. If I could choose my own doctor I would definitely choose one like HOUSE he wouldn't beat around the bush, he would just tell you straight.

Lets begin by saying that House is a fantastic, funny, interesting TV show. One of the best. The quality of picture is very good, also the quality of sound. The actors are superb (especially of course Laurie). The story has its flaws - especialy in medicine - if you are a medical doctor you will really shake your head at some procedures being done, drugs been used and some absurd diagnoses being made. But I understand it is made because it is a TV show and it is more intersting for audience all over the world. The major criticism about this DVD is its lack of subtitles. I really cannot understand their absence, because if you are not native speaker of english, the language is difficult (sometimes fast, somtimes very medical) and the subtitles would really come handy. Thats why I give it a 4 star.

Almost addictive. Can't see how this can maintain its interest but, so far, we have enjoyed practically every episode. We're glad to be shot of Stacey, an unnecessary addition to the female cast, and find ourselves rationing our viewing otherwise we'd be watching every night. It manages to combine medical and personal stories and is all the better when it does that. Cleverclogs House and his medical magic alone would not be so effective. I still think that the British series Bodies beats it hollow but we're glad the family insisted we try it. The condition of this set, bought secondhand at condition good, was fine; not good enough for a gift as the box was slightly damaged, but the discs themselves and the plastic covers are unmarked. It was also sent to France at very little extra cost and arrived dead on time.

A number of the most commended episodes of House happened in season two, so I am glad to own this. The entire cast do a superb job with masses of challenging bits of dialogue. The key six are all excellent, Hugh Laurie awesome. He comes over so well as the doctor who seeks the truth at the cost of everything else. Episodes of House are engaging, informative and relentless. This will remain top television for many years to come.

If you are ill,do you want a doctor that holds your hand and pfaffs around with this or that because he has no real idea about what is wrong with you?Or do you want a doctor who doesn't care to even meet you,but is an absolute ACE at diagnosing precisely what is wrong and fixing it(unless incurable)?House is the latter.He has no time for patients because,as he says,"they all lie".He much prefers to focus on the facts-tests/reports etc.He needs to take his walking stick to the rear ends of his staff of 3 ,though.I don't know which of the 3 is worst-the smarmy ,untrustworthy handsome one?the streetwise pompous rule driven one?the goody-goody sugar and spice one?Each seems more intent on trying to bring down House.And as for the long-suffering head of the hospital,methinks she has dreams about House,and not chaste ones either.Laurie is an absolute revelation in this role .

on time and good

What can be said about a series that must certainly be ranked as one of the most compelling to have ever appeared on television? It is easy to view the slew of awards that "House, M.D." has been nominated for (and won), to recall the litany of accolades the show has garnered from news, entertainment, and magazine critics, and even to review the endless series of online postings concerning the show (like this very one, here, on Amazon), and conclude that, "Yes, "House, M.D." is probably a good show." But in fact, "House, M.D." is more than a good show. For many viewers, the series is easily one of the most fascinating and unusual to have ever been aired on television. Moreover, and dare I say it, the series will likely eventually be ranked amongst the top television shows ever produced on network television. But before I say any more about "House, M.D.," let me briefly for the reader summarize the show. "House, M.D." is a medical drama that takes place at a fictional teaching hospital ("Princeton-Plainsborough Hospital"). The story revolves around a particular doctor, Dr. Gregory House, an individual who has established himself as a medical genius able to solve difficult medical mysteries that other doctors have been unable to solve. Dr. House works with a small group of internists who are serving in residence under him, and who, despite their much less experience, actively work with House to solve medical problems through a technique called a "Differential Diagnosis," a kind of group-based brainstorming session where diagnostic ideas are presented, written on a white board, and systematically eliminated by comparing each hypothesis with the ongoing list of patient symptoms. But Dr. House is more than just a diagnostic genius: he possesses a debilitating leg injury that keeps him in perpetual pain, and he regularly uses powerful prescription painkillers to the point where there is genuine concern that he may, in fact, be a pain medicine addict. But there's more. Along with his genius, House has an incredibly insensitive and offensive demeanor, and seemingly has no concern for social norms, courtesies, or sometimes, even common decency. His unparalleled genius at helping patients is probably what keeps him employed in spite of his incredibly ongoing offensive behavior. What makes this show so compelling, so unique, and so interesting? There is probably no one answer to this question. At the core of it is likely House himself, a character who is fundamentally a contradiction, a walking incongruity, a person that we desperately and increasingly wish to understand, and perhaps, even wish to control to correct his unacceptable behavior. We find ourselves watching this man and so strongly wishing that we can figure him out, to come to a true understanding and belief about him, to solve the mystery of who he really is, and by that knowledge, settle the manifold open questions surrounding him and his relationships to others that each episode more fully presents. Unfortunately, or should I rather say, "fortunately," such an understanding is not easily developed. The complexities, ambiguities, and open questions surrounding the character of House come tantalizingly close to being solved time after time, only to be later shown that what we thought was the answer to this man was really just another false lead, another misunderstanding, another fact to add into this increasingly difficult puzzle. Part of the show's allure is this ongoing dissonance, not only between House and his coworkers, but deeply within House himself. Is he truly an uncaring person? Is he truly a person who views his entire medical career as simply a series of puzzles to be solved, and where people who recover are simply a side effect of the solved puzzle? Does he really look at every social, religious, or ethnic factor as a legitimate target of derision? Is he truly hostile to people's religious convictions? Does he truly believe that his drug addiction is an irrelevant issue to his work? Each episode faces us with House's reaction to these questions to varying degrees, and over time, we may find that we build an increasing understanding of this man, but we often find those understandings torn apart in a later episode, where new observations on House make us rethink what we think we knew. In spite of House's problems and deficiencies, we often find him an imminently likeable character, and we often see hints of goodness in him that he desperately tries to keep hidden from others. Often, it is hinted in the subtilest of ways that House himself wishes to hide from others the fact that he truly does care, but this hint is just as quickly dashed as we witness his next immature toy kicking. (It can sometimes seem that House is more of a four year old in a nursery who is testing his fellow nursery members for territorial markers. In other cases, he is the genius child who seeks to use others as fodder for his most recent theories on human and animal behavior.) "House, M.D.," if the truth be known, does not start out in Season One as a soap opera, but by Season Five for the series run, I think a defensible case can be made that the show takes on many of the trappings of a soap opera, curiously and ironically enough, mirroring the very soap operas that the character House in the show is seen so frequently watching (often, on an old, 1990's style portable television located in his office). This morphing into the arena of the soap opera doesn't really matter, though, for the viewer who has gone through the entire set of previous episodes in order. With no attempt to defend this shift in style, the show uses its first three seasons to genuinely establish itself as a puzzle solving, medical mystery show, with House serving as a medical Sherlock Holmes (sans the hat and the pipe, but plus the strange personality and temperament issues), and the stories are easily carried with each individual episode standing as a mental gymnastic exercise that keeps the viewer wanting more. But strewn through these episodes are myriads of strange, and often, very awkward character interactions that are left unfinished and unexplored, tantalizing us with seeming keys to unlock the mystery of House. It is perhaps inevitable that a show lasting so many years (now in its sixth season) and having such strong characters and unusual trappings would be inevitably drawn to revisit and examine such unfinished business. These "explorations" begin to occur more repeatedly in Season Four, and by Season Five, we see the exaggeration of much of this at the expense of series' original, focal point of medical mysteries to be resolved, which by this point in the series often take back seat to the ever growing personal dramas. But even this doesn't matter. The issues and themes explored in Season Five, while taking on the feeling of a soap opera, are still handled with great expertise and generally fascinating ways, so that we still find ourselves focused on each event, all the time still (unconsciously at times, I must admit) wishing that we can figure House out, get the mystery of House solved, and have some type of a resolution that fits our conception of the real world. By the end of Season Five, we still do not have an answer for this dilemma, and the show uses this dilemma to hold the audience's attention in a powerful manner. The basic premise of the show is so startling unique and fascinating in its own right that the show does not need to rely on cheap "shock" tricks to maintain attention. It is true that there are a number of "shocking" events to occur through the series, and there can be no doubt that the show, being first and foremost a network based television format production, employs "cliffhangers" to hold the viewer through the regular commercial breaks, but it is amazing to see how the show is regularly worked into individual episodes that are artfully crafted into stories that flow, and work, from beginning to end. Quite some time ago, I wrote a long review for "The Rockford Files," a television show in the 1970's that, in my own thinking, achieved the status as being one of the best television shows ever produced. I had written my review at a time when the first "Rockford Files" DVD's were being released, and the opportunity to re-watch these shows reminded me again of the superior writing, the acting, and the impressive interworking of the cast which made this show, not just a cut above the average television show, but a true classic, one that could almost not be challenged in the realm of television. I still feel that way about The Rockford Files, and, truth be known, another very different show from a decade earlier, "The Dick Van Dyke Show," had many of these same characteristics, all coalescing to make what eventual became in both cases a classic production. "The Rockford Files" and "The Dick Van Dyke Show" reached such pinnacles of performance that they remain examples of the very best television ever made, and even the ravages of 30 and 40 years of time have done little but solidify that achievement. "House, M.D." is, in my opinion, is likely destined for that same level of accolade. In the show, we find that same coalescing of features - a truly unique character creation, excellent writing, and a cast that works well together - that will argue for the show's inclusion in that highest level of ranking. But whether that specific claim turns out to be true or not, the fact remains that House, M.D. is one of the most fascinating, intriguing, and enjoyable shows to watch. We witness medical problems and the difficult procedure in diagnosing and treating those problems; we witness the struggles, oddities, and offensiveness (and yes, there are many parts of the show that are incredibly offensive) of a main character who remains both a genius and an enigma, an inscrutable person who is endlessly fascinating to behold; we witness a cast of actors who must earn to interact with the powerful character of House while establishing their own credibility; and finally, but not least of all, we enjoy Hugh Laurie's incredible rendition of the House character. Add these factors up, and you end up with one heck of a fascinating show. I'll say it in conclusion again, that this is one of the best television shows to have appeared in years, and Hugh Laurie is superb in his role as House. You can enjoy it even more on DVD, where there are no commercial interruptions. I rate this as five stars, but the real truth is that it is one BIG star (House) with four other stars with him. Well, make that seven or eight other stars, depending on the season you are currently watching.

House season 2 arrived on time and in great condition. All 6 disks look great. Love this series and wanted to watch it again. Have season 1 so now I can see season 2. He is addictive.

Très bonne série

Der Ablauf jeder Episode folgt stets demselben Schema: ein Patient jedweder Bevölkerungsschicht bricht unter meist erschreckenden, äußerlichen Krankenmerkmalen zusammen. Das Team um Chefdiagnostiker Dr. House ermittelt - in der Regel unter Zeitdruck - per Differenzialdiagnose (d.h. die Summe aller Diagnosen, die als Erklärung eines Symptoms oder der Kombination mehrerer Symptome möglich sind) die passende Therapie, die sich nicht selten als falsch herausstellt. In letzter Minute findet Dr. House fast immer die rettende Lösung - in Season 2 enden jedoch verhältnismäßig viele Folgen, der Realität nahe, ohne Happy End oder gar letal. Nicht wenige Skeptiker und (TV-)Ärztehasser haben vermutlich bei Erscheinen der ersten Staffel DR. HOUSE genervt die Augen verdreht. Denn wieviel Weißkittel und karbolgeschwängerte Atmosphäre verträgt die Fernsehlandschaft noch? Mit dem von David Shore erschaffenen Charakter gelang schließlich das allzu seltene Kunststück, Kritiker wie Publikum gleichermaßen von der einzigartigen, intellektuell herausfordernden Qualität dieser neuen TV-Show zu überzeugen. Der große Verdienst - neben den selbstverständlich ebenso wichtigen, in dem Fall hochklassigen Drehbuchautoren - gebührt allen voran dem Briten Hugh Laurie (PETER'S FRIENDS, SINN UND SINNLICHKEIT), der die Gratwanderung zwischen sarkastischem Ekelpaket und im Grunde genommen heimlichen, einsamen Philanthrophen bravourös meistert. Für alle Einsteiger seien die wesentlichen Merkmale des kauzigen Mediziners kurz wiederholt: brillanter Diagnostiker, der seine sehr fähigen Mitarbeiter ausnahmslos barsch behandelt und dessen permanent schlechte Laune von chronischen Schmerzen im rechten Bein (nach operativer Entfernung eines Muskels) herrührt. Nicht zuletzt diesen Umstand nimmt House gerne zum Vorwand für seinen ab und an auch grundlosen Tablettenkonsum. Betrachtet man die just auf DVD veröffentlichte zweite Season, die von der ersten Folge an (mit Gaststar L.L. Cool J.) Suchtpotenzial entwickelt, so kann man die erste guten Gewissens als Warm-up bezeichnen. Trotz dem oben geschilderten, immer gleichen Handlungsverlauf stellen sich weder Wiederholungen noch Ermüdungserscheinungen ein. Zwar könnten sich die Macher den Vorwurf gefallen lassen, dass die obskuren Krankheitsbilder, die von den Top-Ärzten meist mühevoll zu diagnostizieren sind, ziemlich konstruiert sind. Doch 1. müssten in ähnlicher Form alle storytechnisch kompliziert hergeleiteten Forensiker-Serien vom Schlage C.S.I. kritisiert werden und 2. übersieht man derartige kleinlichen Mängel als medizinischer Laie bereitwillig. Und erliegt vielmehr der schaurig-schönen Faszination für all die absonderlichen Fehlfunktionen, zu denen der menschliche Chemiebaukasten, genannt Körper, fähig ist. Bemerkenswert ist vor allem die Fülle an pointierten, scharfzüngigen Dialogen, mit denen die Halbgötter in Weiß und ihr schwarzes Schaf mit der Kodderschnauze die anfangs ausweglos erscheinenden Krankheitsfälle lösen. Es würde den Rahmen sprengen, auf einzelne Episoden einzugehen, da selten genug jede Folge von gleichbleibender Qualität und höchstem Unterhaltungswert ist. Im Gegensatz zur Season 1 kommen - wahrscheinlich als Zugeständnis an die C.S.I.-verwöhnte Zuschauerschaft - mehr perfekt animierte Einsichten in die innersten Körperregionen zum Einsatz, unbedingt notwendig sind sie indes nicht. Außerdem sind erste Anzeichen von Experimentierfreude wahrzunehmen, die beispielsweise in Episode 8 "Fehlverhalten" zum Aufbrechen der definierten Erzählstruktur führt. In diesem Highlight der 2. Staffel wird in Form einer Befragung, die zur Untersuchung der Falschbehandlung mit tödlichem Ausgang für eine Patientin Dr. Chases durchgeführt wird, die Story in Rückblenden und aus verschiedenen Blickwinkeln höchst spannend erzählt. Ähnliches gilt aber ebenso für alle übrigen Geschichten - von Dr. House' Motorradkauf, dem unerwarteten Besuch seiner Eltern, den Wiederbelebungsversuchen seiner Beziehung zur Krankenhausjuristin Stacy Warner oder den dramatischen Unfall Dr. Camerons, die von einem HIV-Patienten blutig angehustet wird. All denjenigen, die ihre Sinne von den Effektgewittern der großen Leinwand erholen wollen, sei diese unkonventionelle, politisch natürlich völlig unkorrekte US-Serie mit britischem (Humor-)Einschlag ans Herz gelegt. Besser geschriebene und gespielte Serienkost in Kinoqualität bekommt man derzeit kaum zu Gesicht.

"House" is a perfect television show, and is, in my opinion, the only dramatic show currently in production that's worth watching. The show, centered on the acerbic, thoroughly disagreeable, and utterly brilliant Dr. Gregory House, is well written, intelligently directed, and perfectly acted. Hugh Laurie as House deservedly gets the lion's share of the plaudits for the show, but the remaining cast is equally brilliant in their vital supporting roles. Omar Epps, Jennifer Morrison, and Jesse Spencer deserve special mention for playing the young and impressionable doctors putting up with House's eccentricities, but my favorite of the supporting cast is Robert Sean Leonard as oncologist Dr. James Wilson. Leonard's portrayal is both funny and poignant, as are the lines crafted for him by the excellent screenwriters. There are several plotlines in this season, most significantly the reappearance of ex-girlfriend Stacy, played by Sela Ward, in House's life. If I had only one thing to change about season two, it would be to take a bit less time for the Stacy subplot, which, for me, was stretched beyond its usefulness. There are many excellent episodes, and many interesting guest stars including LL Cool J, Ron Livingston, Cynthia Nixon, and Michelle Trachtenberg. The DVD set includes many extras including a "House" documentary, a blooper reel, and producer commentaries: I found them all enjoyable. Prime time television simply does not get any better than this: I highly recommend this season of "House," but urge you to do the sensible thing and buy all the seasons at once. Yes, they're that good.