Psalms (New Cambridge Bible Commentary) Paperback – 17 Feb. 2014

Its a good book and easy to understand. The explanations makes want to read more about the book.

This is great for the clergy or students who may need a deeper and rich understanding of the Psalms. Well worth the money.

I bought this commentary because I was told (correctly) that it dealt with the Psalms in their context (historical and for today) without 'Christianizing' them. This is an integrity I applaud - though I am a Christian minister.The problems I encounter on my Kindle are probably because of the massive data of the text. Opening the book is slow, changing places in the book is slow (and sometimes crashes and has to be reopened) and making notes and highlighting is slow.Still it takes up less space than would the codex version, and I'm glad to use it daily for the Office Psalms.

Opening RemarksIt has seemed like a long wait for this commentary. Both authors have a strong track record with Psalms scholarship. Walter Brueggemann’s contribution to Psalms scholarship, in particular, is immense. He famously initiated little less than a new interpretive paradigm with his characterisation of psalms into psalms of orientation, disorientation and reorientation (see 'Psalms and the Life of Faith', ed: Patrick D. Miller).The commentary opens with a concise, but helpful, survey of key background information on the Psalms. The approach of the commentary is also explained, the use of four interpretive frameworks are singled out:1. An attention to genre, along the lines of Gunkel’s seminal form-critical insights.2. An awareness of cultic setting, although not with dependence on any overarching festival hypothesis.3. Consideration of ancient near-eastern societal issues. This includes matters central to some aspects of Brueggemann’s concern with the dynamics of power within society.4. Exploration of the placement of psalms within the Psalter during its editing.There is nothing controversial about the choice of these four areas. They do however, indicate that the commentary’s strength will lie with its exploration of the ancient context rather than the modern use of the psalms. That this is the case is also flagged in a two sentence conclusion on page 8.Below are some comments on how the commentary tackles some key psalms:Psalms 1 and 2Both of these psalms are flagged as being part of an introduction to the Psalter. This is a consensus of modern Psalms scholarship. What is highly puzzling, however, is that essentially nothing is done to explore the consequences of this, except for a short comment on page 34 (see below for more on the nature of this comment). Surely if something functions as an introduction, to a larger whole, care needs to be given in establishing the implications of this for the entire work?Psalm 1 is ascribed a strong legal function in order to explain the ‘two ways’ described in the psalm. In this way the authors argue that the ‘wicked’, who are said to perish in the psalm, are in fact those in the community that have no place to stand in legal decisions. Such a reading, whilst not unheard of, does not seem convincing. As a poetic device, surely being blown away as chaff and perishing can’t just mean being on the wrong side of communal decisions? A lot of commentators do of course shy away from the traditional connotation of judgement. Yet, however uncomfortable such a topic is, the late date of psalm 1 and the poetic references to the harvest elsewhere in Scripture (e.g. Jeremiah 51:33, Joel 3:13) make it difficult to defend anything other than the a reference to much starker judgement.The exploration of psalm 2 in its cultic setting is very helpful for appreciating its origin and significance. I was however disappointed that the only mention of its Christian re-reading in Christological terms is a passing mention of seven New Testament passages which refer to this psalm. This, I guess, reflects an editorial decision regarding the New Cambridge Bible Commentary to ‘elucidate the Hebrew and Christian scriptures’. Such a choice means that the commentary needs to serve both confessions, but surely the use of the NRSV means that the volumes will be largely used by Christians, many of whom would expect a little more on how we are to use the Psalms today. Enriching though it is to see psalm 2 as a coronation ritual, this will not be how it is used in devotion or liturgy by Christians, nor, of course, will it be used in this way by worshipping Jews. The ‘Bridging Horizons’ section singularly fails to bridge horizons as it points to psalms 1 and 2 as an exhortation to instruction. Many readers will be puzzled by the claim that these two psalms, and indeed the whole Psalter, are primarily a means of instruction. This is indeed one role of the Psalms, but this requires careful explanation, as well as complementing with other dynamics.Psalms 22-24The reservations expressed above do not apply to these three psalms. Each of these psalms is explored with verve and conviction in its ancient context and there are some helpful explorations of later Christian theology. For example:1. Moltmann’s Crucified God is introduced along with the theme of the suffering of the righteous to round off the coverage of psalm 22.2. Jesus as shepherd is explained in terms of a biblical trajectory.3. The use of psalm 24 in celebrating the Triumphal Entry and the Ascension is mentioned.The only disappointment with the treatment of these three psalms is that little is made of the relationship between the three them indicated on page 8.The Psalms of Ascents (120-134)The coverage of these fifteen psalms was a delight to read. Each of these songs is unpacked with clarity, and a care to see them in their societal context. This latter point is important for, as is pointed out at the outset, these psalms of pilgrimage are, perhaps surprisingly, deeply concerned with community life. Not only are these psalms put into their original context eloquently, but attention is given to just how these songs address the societal challenges of Western culture imposed on those journeying on the Life of Faith. In this way there is helpful insight into topics such as:Psalm 120 – homelessness (both literal and figurative),Psalm 122 – a critique of ‘self-centred images of tribal and ideological futures.’,Psalm 127 – a challenge to the culture of success.Psalm 134 – carrying the ‘renewing power of the encounter with God in sanctuary worship into the rest of life’.ConclusionIn summary this commentary has much to commend it. As a single volume, which is manageable and affordable, it successfully covers the ancient context of the psalms with conviction, clarity and insight. In much of its coverage, within the limits of the series, it makes helpful connections with today.However, I found it a little uneven in how well it re-read the psalms from an Easter perspective – in places this is handled well and in others there seems to be a little reticence to make such a re-reading. In particular I found coverage of a specifically Christian re-reading of the Royal Psalms disappointing, especially as Brueggemann’s previous commentary (The Message of the Psalms) on some fifty psalms did not include any Royal Psalms in it. In my view the issues of the microstructure of the Psalter, mentioned in the Introduction to the commentary, is simple not considered fully enough.This is not the definitive magnum opus from Brueggemann I was hoping for, but given its size I was always setting the bar rather too high!

Sent on time. Very good. Product was in good condition as expected.